‘Now [Richard] Horton has a book of his own. The COVID-19 Catastrophe is a sort of history, diagnosis and prescription, in real time. It is wide ranging, querying the changing role of international cooperation and the fallout of austerity economics, and taking a deeper dive into China’s scientific and political response to the crisis than most Western media have offered. But the book returns again and again to the catastrophe in both the United Kingdom and the United States. It is haunted by the question: how did two of the richest, most powerful and most scientifically advanced countries in the world get it so wrong, and cause such ongoing pain for their citizens?’
Read here (Nature, June 18, 2020)
Showing posts with label catastrophe. Show all posts
Showing posts with label catastrophe. Show all posts
Saturday 18 July 2020
Wednesday 15 April 2020
Circumventing catastrophes: ‘We will never know unless we try: again and again, and ever harder’
In the last paragraph of his 100-page book, ‘Does the richness of the few benefit us all?’, the highly distinguished sociologist, Zygmunt Bauman (1925-2017) wrote:
‘It seems that one needs catastrophes to happen in order to recognise and admit (retrospectively alas, only retrospectively...) their coming. A chilling thought if ever there was one. Can we ever refute it? We will never know unless we try: again and again, and ever harder.’
The following is a synopsis of the book published in 2013: ‘It is commonly assumed that the best way to help the poor out of their misery is to allow the rich to get richer, that if the rich pay less taxes then all the rest of us will be better off, and that in the final analysis the richness of the few benefits us all. And yet these commonly held beliefs are flatly contradicted by our daily experience, an abundance of research findings and, indeed, logic. Such bizarre discrepancy between hard facts and popular opinions makes one pause and ask: why are these opinions so widespread and resistant to accumulated and fast-growing evidence to the contrary?
‘This short book is by one of the world’s leading social thinkers is an attempt to answer this question. Bauman lists and scrutinises the tacit assumptions and unreflected-upon convictions upon which such opinions are grounded, finding them one by one to be false, deceitful and misleading.’
Purchase here (Amazon, undated)
‘It seems that one needs catastrophes to happen in order to recognise and admit (retrospectively alas, only retrospectively...) their coming. A chilling thought if ever there was one. Can we ever refute it? We will never know unless we try: again and again, and ever harder.’
The following is a synopsis of the book published in 2013: ‘It is commonly assumed that the best way to help the poor out of their misery is to allow the rich to get richer, that if the rich pay less taxes then all the rest of us will be better off, and that in the final analysis the richness of the few benefits us all. And yet these commonly held beliefs are flatly contradicted by our daily experience, an abundance of research findings and, indeed, logic. Such bizarre discrepancy between hard facts and popular opinions makes one pause and ask: why are these opinions so widespread and resistant to accumulated and fast-growing evidence to the contrary?
‘This short book is by one of the world’s leading social thinkers is an attempt to answer this question. Bauman lists and scrutinises the tacit assumptions and unreflected-upon convictions upon which such opinions are grounded, finding them one by one to be false, deceitful and misleading.’
Purchase here (Amazon, undated)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)